More
than a hundred people stopped
at the Rochdale and Littleborough Peace Group stall on Saturday morning (3 November 2012) to
share ideas for spending the £100 billion which the
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament calculates would be
saved by scrapping the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Rochdale's shoppers showed
strong support for the idea of scrapping Trident and had many
thoughts about how the money saved could be better spent. 40%
suggested increased spending on health; 28% wanted more
resources for education and
services for children; 19% wanted
better services specifically for older people; 18% suggested increased benefits and pensions;17%
wanted jobs and regeneration while 10%
sought better services especially for the disabled. 7% advocated increased spending on improving services in general, while others
wanted more spending on renewable energy, culture and music,
roads, countryside services and MacMillan nurses. One person
suggested "Anything that will do people good not harm!"
On behalf of the
Peace Group, Philip Gilligan said,
"Our town has now been on the sharp end of cuts in essential local services for several years. We have lost acute inpatient services across the board at the Infirmary, and our Council has been forced to slash tens of £millions from its planned spending on services for some of the most vulnerable groups in our communities. Based on population, Rochdale’s share of the current costs of Britain’s unnecessary nuclear arsenal already amounts to £7million per year, but the staggering cost to Rochdale of so-called ’Trident Replacement’ totals over £300million. This is more than the Council would need to restore and maintain all local services at their previous uncut levels. It is time to tell the government and all those who support retention of any nuclear weapons that we want our taxes spent on decent local services not Trident.”, he added.