More
than a hundred people stopped
at the Rochdale and Littleborough Peace Group stall on Saturday morning (3 November 2012) to
share ideas for spending the £100 billion which the
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament calculates would be
saved by scrapping the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Rochdale's shoppers showed
strong support for the idea of scrapping Trident and had many
thoughts about how the money saved could be better spent. 40%
suggested increased spending on health; 28% wanted more
resources for education and
services for children; 19% wanted
better services specifically for older people; 18% suggested increased benefits and pensions;17%
wanted jobs and regeneration while 10%
sought better services especially for the disabled. 7% advocated increased spending on improving services in general, while others
wanted more spending on renewable energy, culture and music,
roads, countryside services and MacMillan nurses. One person
suggested "Anything that will do people good not harm!"
On behalf of the
Peace Group, Philip Gilligan said,
“Once again, people in Rochdale
have said very clearly how
they would spend the £100billion our country could
save by cutting Trident. They know
that Trident is a dangerous waste of public
money and that a nuclear- free Britain would be
£billions better off. They want their taxes
spent on health, education
and social care not on deadly and illegal nuclear
missiles. They want our country's resources
to be spent on the services we need
not squandered on nuclear weapons which threaten nothing
but death and destruction. Many were particularly
shocked to hear that Defence
Secretary Philip Hammond has
recently announced yet more new spending on upgrading the
Trident nuclear weapons system, before parliament has even
made a decision about whether Trident should ever be renewed. They are right to be shocked.
By announcing that they plan to squander
another £350,000,000 in addition to the £billions already
wasted each year to maintain the Trident system, the
government is showing its contempt for both the democratic
process and for the thousands of people in Rochdale and
elsewhere who are suffering because of cuts in essential
services, to benefits and to jobs."
"Our
town has now been on the sharp end of cuts in
essential local services for several years.
We have lost acute inpatient services across the board at the
Infirmary, and our Council has been forced to slash tens
of £millions from its planned spending on services for
some of the most vulnerable groups in our communities. Based
on population, Rochdale’s share of the current costs of
Britain’s unnecessary nuclear arsenal already amounts to
£7million per year, but the staggering cost to Rochdale of
so-called ’Trident Replacement’ totals over £300million.
This is more than the Council would need to restore and
maintain all local services at their previous uncut levels.
It is time to tell the government and all those who support
retention of any nuclear weapons that we want our taxes
spent on decent local services not Trident.”,
he added.