"With the final vote on Trident replacement due in 2016, at an estimated cost of £100bn, this is the final election before the decision – and it is one which requires a higher level of debate than we are seeing at the moment. Senior military figures warn that the £100bn white elephant of Trident replacement does nothing to keep us safe. How a blind commitment to squandering our overstretched national resources on an outdated weapon of mass destruction can be touted as being "strong on defence" is beyond me.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
'People Not Trident'
Rochdale
and littleborough Peace Group joined fellow campaigners from Greater
Manchester and District Campaign for Nuclear Disarmanent (GMDCND) on the
streets yesterday (11 April 2015) urging people to think about the
issue of nuclear weapons when they vote on 7 May 2015. They highlighted
the fact that current plans to replace the Trident nuclear missile
system will cost the country a staggering £100 billion (£100,000,000,000)
and noted that the government already spends £6.6 million a day on
nuclear weapons. They described this as "an appalling waste" and
stressed that cancelling the Trident replacement would release around
£100 billion which could be spent on healthcare, education, housing and
energy, which they described as "the things we need".
Philip Gilligan, on behalf of the Peace Group, said:
"With the final vote on Trident replacement due in 2016, at an estimated cost of £100bn, this is the final election before the decision – and it is one which requires a higher level of debate than we are seeing at the moment. Senior military figures warn that the £100bn white elephant of Trident replacement does nothing to keep us safe. How a blind commitment to squandering our overstretched national resources on an outdated weapon of mass destruction can be touted as being "strong on defence" is beyond me.
"With the final vote on Trident replacement due in 2016, at an estimated cost of £100bn, this is the final election before the decision – and it is one which requires a higher level of debate than we are seeing at the moment. Senior military figures warn that the £100bn white elephant of Trident replacement does nothing to keep us safe. How a blind commitment to squandering our overstretched national resources on an outdated weapon of mass destruction can be touted as being "strong on defence" is beyond me.